18 Months Later: Revisiting the Sonos Ace

Updated Introduction

When I first reviewed the Sonos Ace back in June 2024, I was impressed by the build quality and comfort, which I felt were top-tier for a premium ANC headphone. However, I had significant reservations about the sound quality—particularly the aggressive treble peak—and the Sonos app felt unfinished compared to the competition.

Fast forward 18 months, and I’ve been asked several questions about the Sonos Ace recently, which prompted me to reach back out to Sonos to borrow another unit and see what has changed since launch. This isn’t a complete re-review, but rather a focused look at what has improved with firmware updates and app development, along with some new measurements to see if the hardware itself has changed.

Note: I would like to thank Sonos for allowing me to borrow the Sonos Ace again to gather updated information for this review follow-up.

The Ace is currently available for $399 in both black and white options.

What Has Changed in 18 Months?

After spending time with the Ace again, I’m pleased to report that there have been some meaningful improvements that address several of my original concerns and I have changed my overall score to a 4-star pragmatic rating, not only is it better in very meaningful ways, but it is also cheaper than it was at launch:

1. Significantly Improved ANC Performance

While I thought the ANC was good at launch, it’s noticeably better now. I recently came across SoundGuys’ measurements following the June firmware update, which confirmed what I was hearing—the ANC performance has been substantially improved:

soundguys-updated-ANC-performance.jpg

The noise cancellation now feels much more capable across a wider range of use-cases, making the Ace even more competitive with the best ANC headphones on the market. I tried it on a recent flight as well as some public transport, and in both cases it performed better than I remember, and I feel equal to the AirPods Max.

2. Excellent Voice Call Quality with Side-Tone Support

The voice call experience has become excellent, thanks in large part to the addition of Side-Tone support. Side-Tone allows you to hear your own voice during calls, preventing that awkward situation where you end up shouting because you can’t hear yourself:

app-customisation-side-tone.jpeg

This is a feature I wish more headphones had, and Sonos has implemented it beautifully. It makes the Ace a genuinely excellent option for work-from-home users who spend a lot of time on calls.

3. Impressive Leakage Compensation

One of the most interesting discoveries during this re-evaluation was just how good the leakage compensation is now. I believe this might have been changed from the Soundguys review as they did not find as good a performance change as I noticed.

I had seen some comments online complaining that the Sonos Ace loses bass when ANC or Ambient/Transparency mode is turned off. It turns out this is because the leakage compensation does such an amazing job of maintaining bass even with a broken seal. I have some new measurements later in the review which show how good a job this does with a broken seal.

This means that someone who wears glasses (and therefore has a compromised seal) will not loose any bass unless they turn off the ANC and aware modes. The headphone actively compensates for the lost seal, which is quite impressive technology.

4. App Stability and Remaining Limitations

The Sonos app itself is noticeably more stable than it was 18 months ago—which is probably no surprise. However, it’s still disappointing that we’re limited to just Bass and Treble controls with no parametric EQ.

I genuinely believe that if Sonos could add even a 10-band EQ (if not full PEQ), this would transform the Ace into an extraordinarily good headphone with everything you could want: style, comfort, excellent ANC and transparency, and the ability to fine-tune the tonality to your preference. Most importantly, PEQ would allow users to address that sharp treble peak that continues to be my main criticism. Though I have found a simple way to mitigate this, which I will discuss in the updated measurements section later in the review.

Original Review from June 2024

The following sections contain my original review from June 2024. I’ve kept this intact for reference, though keep in mind that some aspects—particularly around ANC performance and app features—have improved since then. But I have added a section to the measurements with some details of the change to the audio and some details of how you can get it even better.

Introduction

Sonos, a brand renowned for its high-quality consumer speakers and soundbars, has finally ventured into the headphone market with the Sonos Ace. Given Sonos reputation for quality audio in their consumer friendly products, there was a lot of anticipation surrounding the release of the Ace.

sonos-ace-marketing-image.jpg

Note: I would like to thank Sonos for allowing me to borrow the Sonos Ace for a few weeks to gather the information for this review.

The Ace is currently available for $399 in both black and white options, I have been using the black version as you will see in the photos below.

In this review, I will delve into the details of the Sonos Ace, exploring its many features, sound quality, comfort, and see if it is the “best working from home” ANC headphone for you.

Unboxing and Build Quality

The Sonos Ace comes in a well-designed, sturdy box that reflects the brand’s premium image, my unit was already loaned and therefore had been previously opened: IMG_0534 Medium.jpeg

Inside the box you get an interesting case made from recycled materials: sonos-case Medium.jpeg

Under the base you get a small box: sonos-box-content Medium.jpeg

With the cables and a setup manual: IMG_0538 Medium.jpeg Note: My unit had already been opened and the cables had been used.

Inside the box, you’ll find: IMG_0539 Medium.jpeg

The small magnetically attached cable case is a nice unique design choice.

Headphone build quality:

The build quality of the Ace is impressive, with a solid yet lightweight construction. IMG_0553 Medium.jpeg

The materials used feel premium, and the design is minimalist and elegant, it is maybe slightly less premium than the Airpods Max but Sonos have used material in an intelligent way to maximise the comfort so its is considerable lighter than the Airpods Max. IMG_0589 Medium.jpeg

The metal used in the extension mechanism high quality: IMG_0541 Medium.jpeg

The Sonos logo on the right hand ear cup is understated: IMG_0560 Medium.jpeg

The shape of the headphone is good and with the headband has a nice soft foam which compresses nicely: IMG_0567 Medium.jpeg

The earpads are a nice shape, though in my ears they were slightly smaller than I would like: IMG_0543 Medium.jpeg

So, for example compared to the new Sennheiser HD490 Pro earpads which are the perfect size for my larger ears: compared HD490Pro.jpeg

And compared with Hifiman Edition XS you can see how small the ear cups are: IMG_0557 Medium.jpeg

But, the Ace are slightly bigger than the Airpods Max: IMG_0590 Medium.jpeg

I thought it is interesting that Sonos have also adopted magnetic earpads. I hope this becomes a standard in headphones going forward as it is so convenient: IMG_0542 Medium.jpeg Note: I really like how cleverly Sonos used different colours on the left and right and it is super clever that they each side as a different polarity, so you can’t mix them up by mistake.

Here they are compared to the Airpods Max: IMG_0592 Medium.jpeg

One thing to note is the way the Ace folds means they only fold up when you are wearing them rather than both directions, so you can’t fold them down when wearing them: sonos-ace-folding-up Medium.jpeg

Comfort

Other than slightly too small for my ears I found the Sonos Ace is extremely comfortable to wear, thanks to its plush ear cushions and adjustable headband. But I did find them more comfortable than the Airpods Max (both in weight and inner ear comfort), But I did feel the earcups getting slightly warm when out on a long walk. I would hope given how easy it to replace the earpads that we will see custom earpads appearing over the next few months maybe with more breathable material.

Features:

There are a lot of features in the Sonos Ace, but I will try and cover the most important ones:

Wear Detection:

Each earpad has wear detection sensors which will pause music when you take them off your ears: IMG_0555 Medium.jpeg IMG_0554 Medium.jpeg

The settings can be controlled within the Sonos App: IMG_0551 Medium.jpeg

Microphones

The Ace has a total of 8 microphones, you can see some of them on the sides and on the bottom of each ear cup: IMG_0612 Medium.jpeg IMG_0611 Medium.jpeg

Buttons: Content Button Control

The Ace does not have touch controls, but you get a very clever content button, which supports sliding up and down for volume control but also pushing to select content: buttons.jpeg

Lossless Audio Support

I briefly tried the Ace via the usb-c cable provided (strictly speaking I tried the usb-c to usb-c cable) and my Mac showed 16bit stereo with 48Khz: sonos-mac-highres.jpg

I also got ’lossless audio’ via Aptx-HD on my Android DAP though I am still slightly suspicious of that loseless bluetooth is only loseless in a ‘perfect environment’, but its good and right that a premium ANC headphone should have loseless audio in 2024. Apple will need to do something very soon with their Airpods Max connectivity to not be left behind.

Battery life

In summary, the battery life has been great, I only charged them fully once in my 2 weeks and did utilise the quick charge capability a few times, plug them in for a few minutes to rapidly ’top up’ the battery levels, its ‘3 minutes for 3 hours’. The rated battery of up to 30 hours and 24 hours with ANC enable is very believable.

ANC Performance

The active noise cancellation (ANC) on the Sonos Ace is superb, especially for indoor use. The ANC can be toggled using IMG_0550 Medium.jpeg

In my experience, the Ace were the best ANC headphones I have heard at mute the sounds of noisy home environment effectively, providing a quiet and focused listening experience. I swapped between the Ace and the Airpods Max numerous times for this review and this would be my comparisons:

  • Indoor ANC: The Sonos Ace outperforms the AirPods Max in indoor settings, offering superior noise cancellation for typical household noises, TV’s in other rooms and noisy kids talking were almost completely muted.
  • Outdoor ANC: The AirPods Max still holds a slight edge in outdoor ANC performance, particularly in handling wind noise and more complex outdoor soundscapes.

TV Audio Swap (Sonos Soundbar Swap)

I was not able to test this as it currently only supports the Sonos ARC Soundbar but for those in the Sonos ecosystem this will be a major feature. IMG_0604 Medium.jpeg

The idea is to press the button on the left earcup and the sound will automatically mute on your Television and switch the audio to your Ace headphones, that is assuming you are using a Sonos Arc or ( though not yet ) a Sonos Beam.

Note: One of the major complaints so far with the Ace has been the lack of deep integration with other Sonos products, specifically Sonos typically uses Wifi for streaming audio yet the Sonos is uses bluetooth so is excluded from mainly of the typically slick integrations that Sonos provide. The reason nobody has yet done a pure wifi headphone is really that it would be a battery life killer, so it was an obviously trade off to have up to 30 hours battery or a few hours with a heavier battery.

Internal Components

I thought some of the details which iFixit found when taking apart the Ace are very interesting. internals Large.jpeg

Specifically, I think its very interesting that Sonos have used the QCC5181 chipset:

Ace Board Large.jpeg

The datasheet for the QCC1581 reveals lots of extra potential capabilties which we do not currently see being utilised by Sonos: CPU Capabilities.jpg

I specifically like that this CPU includes the “Dual 120MHz (240MHz³) Kalimba audio DSP cores” which provides 10 band PEQ filters to applications using this chipset. Sonos are obviously using 2 PEQ filters for the Bass and Treble adjustments within the app, but that leaves lots of potential for future DSP tweaks and in my EQ recommendations that I have later in this review, I decided to assume that ultimately someone can take advantage of a possible future
update where Sonos can ultimately add PEQ to the Sonos App for the ACE.

Sonos App:

The first time I paired the ACE with the Sonos App I was notified about a firmware update: IMG_0545 Medium.jpeg IMG_0547 Medium.jpeg

Home screen:

So far though the Sonos App has a minimal amount of features for the Ace: IMG_0601 Medium.jpeg

Clicking on the ACE opens the configuration screens: IMG_0606 Medium.jpeg IMG_0605 Medium.jpeg

Clicking on the ‘settings’ icon in the top righthand side reveals some more settings: IMG_0544 Medium.jpeg

EQ Configuration

Currently, the EQ configuration within the Sonos application is very limited, with really just Bass and Treble configration: IMG_0549 Medium.jpeg

As I mentioned in the hardware section above, I believe there are lots of potential with internal hardware as far as sound configuration, so I would encourage Sonos to extend the support on this screen with both ‘preset’ profiles (I think Moondrop have done a good job recently with ‘custom’ profiles like ‘Basshead’ or ‘Reference’ where they fine tune many aspects of the frequency response to give a more familiar sound profile). Of course, a ‘custom’ PEQ with a full 10 band of filters would be amazing and would change my overall opinion about the Ace as you will see in the Sound profile section.

Sound Quality

For my sound quality, I listen to my very long ‘audiotest’ playlist listening for typical ’tells’ within familiar songs and pretty quickly i felt there was too much bass ( which of course is typical of ‘consumer audio’ ) but I lowered the bass by 3 within the EQ configuration and continued for a few days. My overall summary was some songs were excellent but then others where just wrong tonally but let me get into some examples:

Bass

The Sonos Ace has a notable issue with the mid-bass, which even after I lowered the bass can sometimes sound muddy and lack the punch that many listeners might expect. It didn’t affect some classic audiophile tracks like ‘James Blakes’ ‘Limit to your love’ which sounded pretty good, but then ‘Massive Attacks’ ‘Angel’ sounded very muddy.

Midrange

The midrange was pretty clear and well-articulated, providing a good balance for vocals and instruments. However, it doesn’t stand out as exceptionally detailed or rich, and it was only when I lowered the bass, did i feel that it wasn’t getting overloaded. In this price category and with Sonos reputation I would have expected more but overall it is not bad for an ANC headphone, the midrange was fine.

Treble

So part of my processes when I first get a new headphone is, I do listen to a Sweep to see any obviously peaks and trough and it was immediately obvious that there was a large peak (that you will see in the measurements in a little while), initially I lowered the Treble in the Sonos App but that just made the Sonos Ace sound boring, and it should not sound boring so just left the treble as default and listened. So this treble peak cause some sibilant songs to sound especially ‘sharp’ where listening too long would get uncomfortable. Put on an 1980’s electronic playlist (maybe with New Order or the Cure) and it will too much for a long session. Other examples, where The Beatles “She said, she said (2022 remix)” where it was very sibilant.

Soundstage and Imaging

The soundstage is decent for closed-back ANC headphones, offering a reasonable sense of space and instrument separation. But when I listened to some spatial Audio tracks that impression changed. I think Sonos have done an excellent job with the spatial audio. There are clever features supported by the Ace including detecting when you move and switching from spatial to stereo and then switching back when you sit down again. Both the Airpods Max and the Ace have made me feel that ultimately Spatial Audio with the right material is the future of audio.

Specifications and Measurements

  • Driver Configuration: 40mm Dynamic Drivers
  • Height: 7.52 in (191 mm)
  • Width: 6.3 in (160 mm)
  • Depth: 3.35 in (85 mm)
  • Bluetooth Version: Bluetooth 5.4
  • Battery Life: 1060 mAh battery provides up to 30 hours or 24 hours with ANC

Measurements

*Note: These measurements where made with my clone KB501X soft ear pinna with a 711 clone coupler using REW.

These measurements are also available on my measurements headphone database *

Lets get into them:

Frequency Response

ACE Frequency Balance.jpg

For comparison, I have added the 2018 Harman Target, but you can see the mid-bass hump and especially that treble peak which is way beyond what it should be in a headphone at this price.

The balance is reasonable good for a headphone so useful for some EQ which I will present later.

I initially thought this might just be some unit variations, where I might have received an early version of a product, but then I spotted the Headphones.com teams measurements: headphones measurements.jpeg

You can clearly see the same mid bass bump and that treble peak their measurements.

Sonos App ‘EQ’ ranges

Since there is Bass and Treble EQ within the Sonos App I thought I would measure the difference it makes: Sonos App EQ Ranges.jpg

Loudness compensation

Since it is a feature of the App I thought I would measure the differences you get with Loudness compensation turned on: ACE Loudness Compensation.jpg As you can see at lower volumes you get considerable more bass but about the same treble.

Note: I disabled it for my listening.

Distortion

So, I measured distortion at various volumes, let start with a more normal volume: Ace Distortion Normal Volume.jpg

You can see a distortion peak exactly in line with that Treble peak. Of course when I ‘fix’ the treble using EQ and remeasure I get no distortion: Ace Distortion after EQ.jpg

But I also measured the distortion at louder volumes: Ace Distortion High Volume.jpg

Showing the distortion as a percentage shows it is very significant at loud volumes: Ace Distortion High Volume Perc.jpg

Group Delay

Ace Group Delay.jpg This does get a messy around the same frequencies that we have the distortion and high treble peaks.

Frequency Response Comparisons

For the purposes of this review I have been comparing the Ace with my Airpods Max but also with some of my more traditional headphones in this price range, for example the Sennheiser HD600: graph-29 Large.jpeg

So from a sound perspective, as you can see from the graph Airpods Max have a massive sub-bass boost but otherwise are fairly neutral until the treble region. The Sonos Ace on the other hand as a ‘mid-bass’ boost and an uneven midrange and its that most disturbing treble peak that I mentioned earlier. The HD600 lacks bass (without EQ) but otherwise is mostly a reference ’neutral’ headphone and why it is a good benchmark to compare other headphones, especially ones which have built in DSP capabilities as they could be tuned to match the profile of the HD600.

Some EQ Recommendations

After my first week with the ACE I decided to listen exclusively with some PEQ filters. Because of what I learned with the internals of the Ace, I felt, i should use just a few relatively simple filters which you can obviously apply on the Windows / Mac or Android App of EQ App of choice (though I do hope eventually within the Sonos App itself).

graph-23 Large.jpeg

Preamp: 0 dB
Filter 1:  ON  PK  Fc 120 Hz  Gain -6 dB  Q 1.41
Filter 2:  ON  PK  Fc 360 Hz  Gain -4 dB  Q 2.61
Filter 3:  ON  PK  Fc 1200 Hz  Gain -3.56 dB  Q 1.41
Filter 4:  ON  PK  Fc 1500 Hz  Gain 4.43 dB  Q 3.19
Filter 5:  ON  PK  Fc 3700 Hz  Gain 8.42 dB  Q 3.19
Filter 6:  ON  PK  Fc 5000 Hz  Gain -9.27 dB  Q 2.87

I could have added more filters and smoothen out other aspects but the 711 may not be the most accurate in low frequencies or in the upper treble so I mostly focused on where I felt would be most beneficial.

Using these EQ I then compared the Ace with some other headphones in my collection you can see it is suddenly very competitive: graph-30 Large.jpeg

Updated 2025 Measurements: Has the Treble Changed?

One aspect that got me thinking during this re-evaluation was whether the treble response had improved on this newer unit compared to the one I borrowed 18 months ago. While I do feel the treble is slightly smoother, it’s still not where it needs to be.

Here’s a comparison showing the treble differences between my original unit and the new one:

Sonos Ace update.jpg

The new unit shows a somewhat smoother treble response with less of that crazy peak at 6kHz, but the peak is still very much present. One lesson I have learned in the last 18 months is to compare as many different measurements as possible, so I looked at multiple independent 5128 measurements from different sources:

SoundGuys 5128 measurement: soundguys-fr-sonos-ace.jpg

Rtings 5128 measurement: rtings-fr-sonos-ace.jpg

Original Headphones.com 5128 measurement: headphones measurements.jpeg

All of these measurements confirm the same ~6kHz peak, which cannot be fixed simply by lowering the treble control in the app, that just makes the entire treble region sound dull and boring, which defeats the purpose.

So, while I think Sonos have improved the treble and this peak isn’t as bad as it was previously, for me it still highlights the lack of EQ options within the Sonos App is keeping this headphone from being perfect for long listening sessions.

The “Tissue Hack” Solution

These measurements got me thinking about old-fashioned solutions, so I decided to try the classic “tissue over driver” modification:

sonos-ace-tissue-treble-hack.jpg

The idea is simple: by placing a thin layer of tissue over the driver, you lower the overall treble output. Then you can use the treble control in the Sonos app to bring the treble back up to the desired level, but without that harsh peak.

Here are the changes I achieved with this simple hack combined with the slightly better-measuring new unit: fr-better-with-hack.jpg

And comparing it to a preference boundary I highlighted 5 areas: fr-changes-with-hack.png

So,

  1. The bass is still a little boomy, while many will like this and boost it even further, some EQ could smoothen this out
  2. The lower midrange is a bit smoother (possibly this is just some better manufacturing in the latest Ace models)
  3. The lower treble is much better in this area with this tissue ‘hack’
  4. And significantly better in this problem area
  5. But the upper treble is a little bit less ’technical’ but for me the overall treble is better

I think these results are impressive for a little hack. The tissue dampens the peak while mostly maintaining overall treble extension, and the app’s treble control can then be used to fine-tune the overall balance to your preference. This makes the Ace much more pleasant for long listening sessions, removing potential sibilant issues.

Summary of the Updated Experience

After this extended re-evaluation, I feel the Sonos Ace has matured into a much better ANC headphone than it was at launch. The hardware was always excellent, and the firmware improvements—particularly to ANC performance, side-tone support, and leakage compensation—have made a real difference in day-to-day use.

The app is more stable, though I still hope Sonos will eventually add parametric EQ (perhaps saving that for the Sonos Ace 2?). In the meantime, my simple tissue hack can help anyone who finds the treble too sharp or sibilant.

With these improvements, the Ace now offers:

  • Exceptional build quality and comfort
  • Top-tier ANC performance that rivals the best in the market
  • Excellent voice call quality with side-tone support
  • Impressive leakage compensation technology
  • A more stable and refined app experience

The main remaining limitation is the inability to properly address the treble peak without resorting to physical modifications or external EQ software.

Rating

For my pragmatic rating, I like to see a balance between sound quality, features and price.

Original Rating (June 2024): I gave the Ace a 3-star pragmatic rating because the sound quality was letting down an otherwise excellent headphone. For ANC quality alone, I would have given it 4 stars, and for comfort and build quality, it deserved very high marks as well.

Updated Rating (December 2025): After 18 months of firmware improvements, I’m upgrading my rating to 4 stars. Here’s why:

  • ANC Performance: Now genuinely 5-star quality, rivaling the best ANC headphones on the market
  • Features: The addition of side-tone support and improved leakage compensation make this an excellent work-from-home headphone
  • App Stability: Much more polished and reliable than at launch
  • Build Quality & Comfort: Still exceptional (5 stars)
  • Sound Quality: Remains the weak point, though slightly improved

The Ace would achieve a full 5-star rating if Sonos would add parametric EQ or even a 10-band EQ to the app. The hardware is clearly capable of it (thanks to the QCC5181 chipset), and it would allow users to properly address the treble peak. Until then, enthusiasts can use external EQ software or the tissue hack I’ve described.

Conclusion

Original Conclusion (June 2024): The Sonos Ace headphones were a solid first attempt by Sonos in the headphone market. The hardware was almost perfect, but the sound quality and unfinished app were holding back an otherwise excellent product.

Updated Conclusion (December 2025): Eighteen months later, the Sonos Ace has matured into a genuinely compelling premium ANC headphone. My initial optimism about Sonos’s track record of ongoing improvements has been validated—they’ve delivered meaningful firmware updates that have transformed the user experience.

The ANC is now among the best available, the side-tone feature makes it exceptional for voice calls, and the leakage compensation technology is impressively sophisticated. The app is stable and polished. At $449, the Ace now competes much more effectively with established premium brands.

Who Should Buy the Sonos Ace?

  • Ideal for: Work-from-home users who need excellent ANC and voice call quality, Sonos ecosystem owners (especially with a compatible soundbar), anyone who prioritizes comfort and build quality
  • Consider alternatives if: You’re a critical listener who needs perfectly neutral sound out of the box, or you refuse to use external EQ software or physical modifications

The one remaining frustration is the lack of parametric EQ in the app. This would be a 5-star headphone if Sonos would simply unlock the full DSP capabilities of the QCC5181 chipset. Perhaps we’ll see this in a future update—or in the Sonos Ace 2.

For now, the Ace has evolved from “promising but flawed” to “excellent, with one caveat.” That’s impressive progress, and it demonstrates Sonos’s commitment to continually improving their products even after launch.